Service permanent establishment requires non-auxiliary services, while arm's-length distributor remuneration precludes further profit attribution in I...
Make-available condition excludes standard SaaS subscription receipts where customers receive no independently usable technical knowledge after subscr...
Anonymous donation classification fails where charitable trusts maintain undisputed donor identity records and evidence corpus contributions' intended...
Transfer pricing method selection favours TNMM where medical-equipment distribution involves substantial post-import value addition and operational ri...
Post-export shipping bill conversion remains available where contemporaneous evidence supports EPCG benefits despite curable procedural omissions and ...
A belated operational creditor claim in CIRP was rejected because the claimant did not supply the breakup and supporting material needed for verification, and the claim could not be matched with the corporate debtor's records. The NCLAT held that the claimant failed to rebut the Resolution Professional's reasons for rejection, including non-response to repeated requests and lack of proof for the asserted interest component. Because the resolution process had already advanced to the stage where the resolution plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors and filed before the Adjudicating Authority, the deficient claim could not be entertained. The rejection was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
A belated operational creditor claim in CIRP was rejected because the claimant did not supply the breakup and supporting material needed for verification, and the claim could not be matched with the corporate debtor's records. The NCLAT held that the claimant failed to rebut the Resolution Professional's reasons for rejection, including non-response to repeated requests and lack of proof for the asserted interest component. Because the resolution process had already advanced to the stage where the resolution plan was approved by the Committee of Creditors and filed before the Adjudicating Authority, the deficient claim could not be entertained. The rejection was upheld and the appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
