Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
A taxpayer showing prima facie prior payment of the same tax amount was entitled to place proof before the proper officer through a rectification application before any recovery action was taken. Where the revenue could not dispute that the receipt corresponded to the amount later treated as short-paid, the court directed verification in accordance with law to avoid double recovery of tax already paid. The petitioner was permitted to file the rectification application within the time granted, and the proper officer was required to consider it within a reasonable period.
A taxpayer showing prima facie prior payment of the same tax amount was entitled to place proof before the proper officer through a rectification application before any recovery action was taken. Where the revenue could not dispute that the receipt corresponded to the amount later treated as short-paid, the court directed verification in accordance with law to avoid double recovery of tax already paid. The petitioner was permitted to file the rectification application within the time granted, and the proper officer was required to consider it within a reasonable period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
