Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
A taxpayer showing prima facie prior payment of the same tax amount was entitled to place proof before the proper officer through a rectification application before any recovery action was taken. Where the revenue could not dispute that the receipt corresponded to the amount later treated as short-paid, the court directed verification in accordance with law to avoid double recovery of tax already paid. The petitioner was permitted to file the rectification application within the time granted, and the proper officer was required to consider it within a reasonable period.
A taxpayer showing prima facie prior payment of the same tax amount was entitled to place proof before the proper officer through a rectification application before any recovery action was taken. Where the revenue could not dispute that the receipt corresponded to the amount later treated as short-paid, the court directed verification in accordance with law to avoid double recovery of tax already paid. The petitioner was permitted to file the rectification application within the time granted, and the proper officer was required to consider it within a reasonable period.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
