Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Concessional GST for freight and time charter services was subject to non-availment of input tax credit, but the Court held that wrongly availed credit did not justify denial of the concessional entry by applying the higher tax rate. Treating the notification as both a rate and exemption notification, the Court applied Chandrapur Magnet Wires and Unichem Laboratories and held that the proper course was reversal or payment of the inadmissible credit, with interest and penalty. The impugned order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh determination of the actual credit wrongly availed and utilised, together with consequential interest and 100% penalty.
Concessional GST for freight and time charter services was subject to non-availment of input tax credit, but the Court held that wrongly availed credit did not justify denial of the concessional entry by applying the higher tax rate. Treating the notification as both a rate and exemption notification, the Court applied Chandrapur Magnet Wires and Unichem Laboratories and held that the proper course was reversal or payment of the inadmissible credit, with interest and penalty. The impugned order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh determination of the actual credit wrongly availed and utilised, together with consequential interest and 100% penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.