Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Concessional GST for freight and time charter services was subject to non-availment of input tax credit, but the Court held that wrongly availed credit did not justify denial of the concessional entry by applying the higher tax rate. Treating the notification as both a rate and exemption notification, the Court applied Chandrapur Magnet Wires and Unichem Laboratories and held that the proper course was reversal or payment of the inadmissible credit, with interest and penalty. The impugned order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh determination of the actual credit wrongly availed and utilised, together with consequential interest and 100% penalty.
Concessional GST for freight and time charter services was subject to non-availment of input tax credit, but the Court held that wrongly availed credit did not justify denial of the concessional entry by applying the higher tax rate. Treating the notification as both a rate and exemption notification, the Court applied Chandrapur Magnet Wires and Unichem Laboratories and held that the proper course was reversal or payment of the inadmissible credit, with interest and penalty. The impugned order was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh determination of the actual credit wrongly availed and utilised, together with consequential interest and 100% penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.