Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
A writ petition against a detailed GST adjudication order was not entertained because the petitioner had already replied to the show cause notice and the impugned order was appealable. The Court found no basis to interfere in writ jurisdiction, especially since the petition was filed long after the order. It did not examine the merits, including the dispute limited to interest under Section 50 of the GST enactments, and instead left the petitioner to the statutory appellate remedy. Liberty was granted to file an appeal before the appellate authority within thirty days.
A writ petition against a detailed GST adjudication order was not entertained because the petitioner had already replied to the show cause notice and the impugned order was appealable. The Court found no basis to interfere in writ jurisdiction, especially since the petition was filed long after the order. It did not examine the merits, including the dispute limited to interest under Section 50 of the GST enactments, and instead left the petitioner to the statutory appellate remedy. Liberty was granted to file an appeal before the appellate authority within thirty days.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
