Condonation of Delay: directoral disputes and pending company proceedings can constitute reasonable cause, allowing a belated return to be treated as ...
Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
A writ petition against a detailed GST adjudication order was not entertained because the petitioner had already replied to the show cause notice and the impugned order was appealable. The Court found no basis to interfere in writ jurisdiction, especially since the petition was filed long after the order. It did not examine the merits, including the dispute limited to interest under Section 50 of the GST enactments, and instead left the petitioner to the statutory appellate remedy. Liberty was granted to file an appeal before the appellate authority within thirty days.
A writ petition against a detailed GST adjudication order was not entertained because the petitioner had already replied to the show cause notice and the impugned order was appealable. The Court found no basis to interfere in writ jurisdiction, especially since the petition was filed long after the order. It did not examine the merits, including the dispute limited to interest under Section 50 of the GST enactments, and instead left the petitioner to the statutory appellate remedy. Liberty was granted to file an appeal before the appellate authority within thirty days.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
