Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Liquidated damages, underwriting commission and structuring fees were treated as interest for exemption under section 10(23G): liquidated damages were covered by the court's earlier ruling, underwriting commission fell within the Explanation to section 10(23G) as commission for extending a guarantee or enhancing credit, and structuring fees were included within the expanded definition of interest in section 2(28A) as service fee or other charge connected with borrowed money. On deductions, the court held that sections 36(1)(viia)(c) and 36(1)(viii) operate independently, so deduction under one provision cannot be deferred until the other is exhausted; the amendment to section 36(1)(viii) affected only computation. The questions addressed were answered in favour of the assessee.
Liquidated damages, underwriting commission and structuring fees were treated as interest for exemption under section 10(23G): liquidated damages were covered by the court's earlier ruling, underwriting commission fell within the Explanation to section 10(23G) as commission for extending a guarantee or enhancing credit, and structuring fees were included within the expanded definition of interest in section 2(28A) as service fee or other charge connected with borrowed money. On deductions, the court held that sections 36(1)(viia)(c) and 36(1)(viii) operate independently, so deduction under one provision cannot be deferred until the other is exhausted; the amendment to section 36(1)(viii) affected only computation. The questions addressed were answered in favour of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.