Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
ITAT held that the DVO valuation obtained in a co-owner's case applied equally to the assessee in respect of the same jointly purchased flats. It also treated the Finance Act, 2020 amendment increasing the tolerance band under section 56(2)(x)(b) from 5 per cent to 10 per cent as clarificatory and curative, with retrospective effect. As the difference between the DVO value and the agreed consideration was within that 10 per cent band, no addition was sustainable and the addition under section 56(2)(x)(b) was deleted.
ITAT held that the DVO valuation obtained in a co-owner's case applied equally to the assessee in respect of the same jointly purchased flats. It also treated the Finance Act, 2020 amendment increasing the tolerance band under section 56(2)(x)(b) from 5 per cent to 10 per cent as clarificatory and curative, with retrospective effect. As the difference between the DVO value and the agreed consideration was within that 10 per cent band, no addition was sustainable and the addition under section 56(2)(x)(b) was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
