Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
ITAT held that the DVO valuation obtained in a co-owner's case applied equally to the assessee in respect of the same jointly purchased flats. It also treated the Finance Act, 2020 amendment increasing the tolerance band under section 56(2)(x)(b) from 5 per cent to 10 per cent as clarificatory and curative, with retrospective effect. As the difference between the DVO value and the agreed consideration was within that 10 per cent band, no addition was sustainable and the addition under section 56(2)(x)(b) was deleted.
ITAT held that the DVO valuation obtained in a co-owner's case applied equally to the assessee in respect of the same jointly purchased flats. It also treated the Finance Act, 2020 amendment increasing the tolerance band under section 56(2)(x)(b) from 5 per cent to 10 per cent as clarificatory and curative, with retrospective effect. As the difference between the DVO value and the agreed consideration was within that 10 per cent band, no addition was sustainable and the addition under section 56(2)(x)(b) was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
