Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
ITAT held that the DVO valuation obtained in a co-owner's case applied equally to the assessee in respect of the same jointly purchased flats. It also treated the Finance Act, 2020 amendment increasing the tolerance band under section 56(2)(x)(b) from 5 per cent to 10 per cent as clarificatory and curative, with retrospective effect. As the difference between the DVO value and the agreed consideration was within that 10 per cent band, no addition was sustainable and the addition under section 56(2)(x)(b) was deleted.
ITAT held that the DVO valuation obtained in a co-owner's case applied equally to the assessee in respect of the same jointly purchased flats. It also treated the Finance Act, 2020 amendment increasing the tolerance band under section 56(2)(x)(b) from 5 per cent to 10 per cent as clarificatory and curative, with retrospective effect. As the difference between the DVO value and the agreed consideration was within that 10 per cent band, no addition was sustainable and the addition under section 56(2)(x)(b) was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
