Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
ITAT held that the DVO valuation obtained in a co-owner's case applied equally to the assessee in respect of the same jointly purchased flats. It also treated the Finance Act, 2020 amendment increasing the tolerance band under section 56(2)(x)(b) from 5 per cent to 10 per cent as clarificatory and curative, with retrospective effect. As the difference between the DVO value and the agreed consideration was within that 10 per cent band, no addition was sustainable and the addition under section 56(2)(x)(b) was deleted.
ITAT held that the DVO valuation obtained in a co-owner's case applied equally to the assessee in respect of the same jointly purchased flats. It also treated the Finance Act, 2020 amendment increasing the tolerance band under section 56(2)(x)(b) from 5 per cent to 10 per cent as clarificatory and curative, with retrospective effect. As the difference between the DVO value and the agreed consideration was within that 10 per cent band, no addition was sustainable and the addition under section 56(2)(x)(b) was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
