Regulatory consolidation for investment advisers: SEBI issues master circular consolidating guidance and prescribing compliance, reporting, fees and s...
Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Capital gains on a slump sale under section 50B were recomputed to allow reduction of capital work-in-progress that had been inadvertently omitted from the original working. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had already offered the slump sale gain in the original return, explained the omission during assessment, and showed the asset consistently in earlier balance sheets. As the Assessing Officer rejected the claim only because it was not made through a revised return, without disputing its factual correctness or adducing contrary material, the correction could not be denied on that procedural ground. The appellate order allowing the recomputation was upheld.
Capital gains on a slump sale under section 50B were recomputed to allow reduction of capital work-in-progress that had been inadvertently omitted from the original working. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had already offered the slump sale gain in the original return, explained the omission during assessment, and showed the asset consistently in earlier balance sheets. As the Assessing Officer rejected the claim only because it was not made through a revised return, without disputing its factual correctness or adducing contrary material, the correction could not be denied on that procedural ground. The appellate order allowing the recomputation was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
