Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Rental receipts from the assessee's property were held to retain the character of income from house property because the assessee had consistently offered them under that head in earlier scrutiny assessments and the Revenue gave no basis to treat them as business income; deduction under section 24(a) was therefore allowed. The Tribunal also held that expenditure on renovation and erection of a temporary office structure, supported by bills and vouchers, was incurred to facilitate business more efficiently and was not shown to create an enduring capital asset; depreciation on the temporary structure was accordingly allowable.
Rental receipts from the assessee's property were held to retain the character of income from house property because the assessee had consistently offered them under that head in earlier scrutiny assessments and the Revenue gave no basis to treat them as business income; deduction under section 24(a) was therefore allowed. The Tribunal also held that expenditure on renovation and erection of a temporary office structure, supported by bills and vouchers, was incurred to facilitate business more efficiently and was not shown to create an enduring capital asset; depreciation on the temporary structure was accordingly allowable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.