Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Rental receipts from the assessee's property were held to retain the character of income from house property because the assessee had consistently offered them under that head in earlier scrutiny assessments and the Revenue gave no basis to treat them as business income; deduction under section 24(a) was therefore allowed. The Tribunal also held that expenditure on renovation and erection of a temporary office structure, supported by bills and vouchers, was incurred to facilitate business more efficiently and was not shown to create an enduring capital asset; depreciation on the temporary structure was accordingly allowable.
Rental receipts from the assessee's property were held to retain the character of income from house property because the assessee had consistently offered them under that head in earlier scrutiny assessments and the Revenue gave no basis to treat them as business income; deduction under section 24(a) was therefore allowed. The Tribunal also held that expenditure on renovation and erection of a temporary office structure, supported by bills and vouchers, was incurred to facilitate business more efficiently and was not shown to create an enduring capital asset; depreciation on the temporary structure was accordingly allowable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.