International transaction characterisation of domestic divestment of support services business rejected; transaction between resident associated enter...
Minimum Import Price restrictions for Black Pepper, Areca-nuts and Apples upheld; procedural laying failure not fatal, notifications to be placed befo...
Transaction value between related persons requires market-equivalent pricing; importer must prove declared value mirrors ordinary international trade ...
Classification of exported insecticides under export tariff affirmed; reclassification and related penalties set aside and MEIS scrip jurisdiction rec...
Under section 11, a trust could set off excess charitable expenditure of earlier years against income of the subsequent year for AY 2017-18, because pre-01/04/2022 law contained no restriction that income must be applied only in the year it arose. The Finance Act, 2021 insertion of Explanation 5 to section 11(1), which bars such set-off, was treated as prospective from 01/04/2022. The claim could not be rejected for want of Form 9A, as that form was not required for this adjustment. The ITAT remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer only to verify the carried forward deficit and supporting records before granting relief.
Under section 11, a trust could set off excess charitable expenditure of earlier years against income of the subsequent year for AY 2017-18, because pre-01/04/2022 law contained no restriction that income must be applied only in the year it arose. The Finance Act, 2021 insertion of Explanation 5 to section 11(1), which bars such set-off, was treated as prospective from 01/04/2022. The claim could not be rejected for want of Form 9A, as that form was not required for this adjustment. The ITAT remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer only to verify the carried forward deficit and supporting records before granting relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
