Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Exemption under section 11(2) could not be denied solely because Form No. 10 described the accumulation purpose as "purpose of the trust" when no substantive breach of sections 11 or 13(1)(d) was shown. The Tribunal noted that the assessee remained registered under section 12A and that no violation was established in the relevant year, earlier years, or during utilisation of the accumulated income. Applying the principle in Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purshottam Public Charitable Trust, it held that greater specificity in Form No. 10 was not required in the absence of any statutory non-compliance. The disallowance and consequential taxation were deleted.
Exemption under section 11(2) could not be denied solely because Form No. 10 described the accumulation purpose as "purpose of the trust" when no substantive breach of sections 11 or 13(1)(d) was shown. The Tribunal noted that the assessee remained registered under section 12A and that no violation was established in the relevant year, earlier years, or during utilisation of the accumulated income. Applying the principle in Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purshottam Public Charitable Trust, it held that greater specificity in Form No. 10 was not required in the absence of any statutory non-compliance. The disallowance and consequential taxation were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.