Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Exemption under section 11(2) could not be denied solely because Form No. 10 described the accumulation purpose as "purpose of the trust" when no substantive breach of sections 11 or 13(1)(d) was shown. The Tribunal noted that the assessee remained registered under section 12A and that no violation was established in the relevant year, earlier years, or during utilisation of the accumulated income. Applying the principle in Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purshottam Public Charitable Trust, it held that greater specificity in Form No. 10 was not required in the absence of any statutory non-compliance. The disallowance and consequential taxation were deleted.
Exemption under section 11(2) could not be denied solely because Form No. 10 described the accumulation purpose as "purpose of the trust" when no substantive breach of sections 11 or 13(1)(d) was shown. The Tribunal noted that the assessee remained registered under section 12A and that no violation was established in the relevant year, earlier years, or during utilisation of the accumulated income. Applying the principle in Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purshottam Public Charitable Trust, it held that greater specificity in Form No. 10 was not required in the absence of any statutory non-compliance. The disallowance and consequential taxation were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
