Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Writ challenges to show-cause and pre-intimation notices blocking input tax credit were held premature where the disputes turned on individual facts and the CGST Act and Rules provided a complete code. The Court declined to examine the merits of the proposed ITC action or the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) at this stage, finding that such issues required case-specific adjudication after replies and objections were considered. Petitioners were permitted to respond to the notices, and the statutory authorities were directed to decide the matters in accordance with law, while keeping all contentions open.
Writ challenges to show-cause and pre-intimation notices blocking input tax credit were held premature where the disputes turned on individual facts and the CGST Act and Rules provided a complete code. The Court declined to examine the merits of the proposed ITC action or the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) at this stage, finding that such issues required case-specific adjudication after replies and objections were considered. Petitioners were permitted to respond to the notices, and the statutory authorities were directed to decide the matters in accordance with law, while keeping all contentions open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
