Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A writ petition against an assessment order was held not maintainable after the assessee had already invoked rectification under Section 161, as parallel recourse was impermissible; it was also rejected as time-barred. The rectification order was treated as appealable under Section 107, which was construed broadly to cover orders passed under the Act, including Section 161 orders. The Court therefore directed resort to the statutory appellate remedy, distinguished earlier TNGST Act authority, and condoned delay for filing the appeal within the time granted, subject to statutory conditions including pre-deposit.
A writ petition against an assessment order was held not maintainable after the assessee had already invoked rectification under Section 161, as parallel recourse was impermissible; it was also rejected as time-barred. The rectification order was treated as appealable under Section 107, which was construed broadly to cover orders passed under the Act, including Section 161 orders. The Court therefore directed resort to the statutory appellate remedy, distinguished earlier TNGST Act authority, and condoned delay for filing the appeal within the time granted, subject to statutory conditions including pre-deposit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
