Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Employee conflict disclosures and investment restrictions expand with new recusal duties, post-employment limits, and compliance reporting requirement...
Section 263 confers broad revisional power to examine an...
Revisional power in block assessment upheld, undisclosed search income sustained, freight suppression addition restored, accrued lorry hire liability confirmed.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 263 confers broad revisional power to examine an assessment order and direct fresh assessment, modification or cancellation when the order is erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue; that power applies equally to a block assessment under section 158BC read with section 143(3), so the revision was upheld. Applying ACIT v. A.R. Enterprises, advance tax payment or a belated return filed after search does not convert undisclosed income into disclosed income, and the AY 2002-2003 amount was correctly treated as undisclosed income. The deletion of addition for suppression of freight charges was set aside as the contrary assumption about matching expenditure was untenable, while the lorry hire provision was treated as accrued liability under mercantile accounting and the deletion on that issue was sustained. The remand on token booking receipts was left undisturbed.
Section 263 confers broad revisional power to examine an assessment order and direct fresh assessment, modification or cancellation when the order is erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue; that power applies equally to a block assessment under section 158BC read with section 143(3), so the revision was upheld. Applying ACIT v. A.R. Enterprises, advance tax payment or a belated return filed after search does not convert undisclosed income into disclosed income, and the AY 2002-2003 amount was correctly treated as undisclosed income. The deletion of addition for suppression of freight charges was set aside as the contrary assumption about matching expenditure was untenable, while the lorry hire provision was treated as accrued liability under mercantile accounting and the deletion on that issue was sustained. The remand on token booking receipts was left undisturbed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
