Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Prior-period expenditure may be considered for the correct assessment year where its genuineness is undisputed and the surrounding circumstances support the claim. The text notes that the expenditure was not disputed by the revenue and, because the assessee was a public company, the court directed that the claim be examined for AY 2003-04 if a revised computation was filed within the stated time. The operative effect is that the assessee was permitted to seek consideration of the expenditure in the appropriate year, rather than having the claim rejected on the basis of timing alone.
Prior-period expenditure may be considered for the correct assessment year where its genuineness is undisputed and the surrounding circumstances support the claim. The text notes that the expenditure was not disputed by the revenue and, because the assessee was a public company, the court directed that the claim be examined for AY 2003-04 if a revised computation was filed within the stated time. The operative effect is that the assessee was permitted to seek consideration of the expenditure in the appropriate year, rather than having the claim rejected on the basis of timing alone.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
