Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Addition for unexplained expenditure on alleged bogus purchases was deleted because the books of account were not rejected and there was no tangible material showing that the purchases were inflated, bogus or otherwise unexplained. The assessee had produced primary records, including books, stock and purchase registers, bank statements, import documents and supplier ledgers, and the department did not discredit the quantitative or banking evidence; an ad hoc percentage disallowance could not replace proof. On the TDS mismatch issue arising from Form 26AS discrepancies, the direction to verify the assessee's claim of revised TDS returns and delete the addition if supported was upheld.
Addition for unexplained expenditure on alleged bogus purchases was deleted because the books of account were not rejected and there was no tangible material showing that the purchases were inflated, bogus or otherwise unexplained. The assessee had produced primary records, including books, stock and purchase registers, bank statements, import documents and supplier ledgers, and the department did not discredit the quantitative or banking evidence; an ad hoc percentage disallowance could not replace proof. On the TDS mismatch issue arising from Form 26AS discrepancies, the direction to verify the assessee's claim of revised TDS returns and delete the addition if supported was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4823 
Join Channel 
