Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
After insertion of Section 12A(2) and the corresponding amendment to Section 12AA(1), registration for charitable exemption under Sections 11 and 12 operates only from the assessment year immediately following the financial year in which the application is made. The earlier view permitting registration from the date of creation of the institution or another chosen date was displaced, and Section 12A registration was treated as a pre-condition with no independent retrospective effect for exemption claims. The proviso to Section 12A(2) did not apply because no relevant assessment proceedings were pending. The HC therefore set aside the Tribunal's order granting retrospective registration and upheld only prospective registration.
After insertion of Section 12A(2) and the corresponding amendment to Section 12AA(1), registration for charitable exemption under Sections 11 and 12 operates only from the assessment year immediately following the financial year in which the application is made. The earlier view permitting registration from the date of creation of the institution or another chosen date was displaced, and Section 12A registration was treated as a pre-condition with no independent retrospective effect for exemption claims. The proviso to Section 12A(2) did not apply because no relevant assessment proceedings were pending. The HC therefore set aside the Tribunal's order granting retrospective registration and upheld only prospective registration.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.