Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Income from sale of assets of a bank under liquidation was held not to be diverted at source by overriding title in favour of DICGC; the income accrued to the official liquidator, and the claim of no taxable accrual was rejected. In rectification proceedings, the Tribunal held that the set-off of deemed short-term capital gain on depreciable assets against brought forward business loss was a debatable issue and could not be corrected as an apparent mistake under section 154; the rectification order was quashed. It also held that a bad debt written off in the ordinary course of banking business satisfied the statutory conditions, and actual proof of irrecoverability was not required once the write-off was made; the disallowance was deleted.
Income from sale of assets of a bank under liquidation was held not to be diverted at source by overriding title in favour of DICGC; the income accrued to the official liquidator, and the claim of no taxable accrual was rejected. In rectification proceedings, the Tribunal held that the set-off of deemed short-term capital gain on depreciable assets against brought forward business loss was a debatable issue and could not be corrected as an apparent mistake under section 154; the rectification order was quashed. It also held that a bad debt written off in the ordinary course of banking business satisfied the statutory conditions, and actual proof of irrecoverability was not required once the write-off was made; the disallowance was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.