Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Income from sale of assets of a bank under liquidation was held not to be diverted at source by overriding title in favour of DICGC; the income accrued to the official liquidator, and the claim of no taxable accrual was rejected. In rectification proceedings, the Tribunal held that the set-off of deemed short-term capital gain on depreciable assets against brought forward business loss was a debatable issue and could not be corrected as an apparent mistake under section 154; the rectification order was quashed. It also held that a bad debt written off in the ordinary course of banking business satisfied the statutory conditions, and actual proof of irrecoverability was not required once the write-off was made; the disallowance was deleted.
Income from sale of assets of a bank under liquidation was held not to be diverted at source by overriding title in favour of DICGC; the income accrued to the official liquidator, and the claim of no taxable accrual was rejected. In rectification proceedings, the Tribunal held that the set-off of deemed short-term capital gain on depreciable assets against brought forward business loss was a debatable issue and could not be corrected as an apparent mistake under section 154; the rectification order was quashed. It also held that a bad debt written off in the ordinary course of banking business satisfied the statutory conditions, and actual proof of irrecoverability was not required once the write-off was made; the disallowance was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.