Fraudulently obtained SEIS scrips cannot support customs exemption; recovery, confiscation and penalties were sustained, but employee penalty fell awa...
Money deposited in court pursuant to a pre-deposit order was treated as compliance with the court's direction and remained an asset of the corporate debtor; on commencement of CIRP, it had to be released to the resolution professional for distribution under the IBC, with accrued interest included. The supplier's attempt to withdraw the amount was rejected because its claim had to be pursued within the insolvency process. The writ petition challenging the MSME award was also held not maintainable, as an alternate statutory appeal remedy existed under the MSME Act and, independently, section 14 of the IBC barred continuation of proceedings against the corporate debtor after CIRP began.
Money deposited in court pursuant to a pre-deposit order was treated as compliance with the court's direction and remained an asset of the corporate debtor; on commencement of CIRP, it had to be released to the resolution professional for distribution under the IBC, with accrued interest included. The supplier's attempt to withdraw the amount was rejected because its claim had to be pursued within the insolvency process. The writ petition challenging the MSME award was also held not maintainable, as an alternate statutory appeal remedy existed under the MSME Act and, independently, section 14 of the IBC barred continuation of proceedings against the corporate debtor after CIRP began.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
