Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Money deposited in court pursuant to a pre-deposit order was treated as compliance with the court's direction and remained an asset of the corporate debtor; on commencement of CIRP, it had to be released to the resolution professional for distribution under the IBC, with accrued interest included. The supplier's attempt to withdraw the amount was rejected because its claim had to be pursued within the insolvency process. The writ petition challenging the MSME award was also held not maintainable, as an alternate statutory appeal remedy existed under the MSME Act and, independently, section 14 of the IBC barred continuation of proceedings against the corporate debtor after CIRP began.
Money deposited in court pursuant to a pre-deposit order was treated as compliance with the court's direction and remained an asset of the corporate debtor; on commencement of CIRP, it had to be released to the resolution professional for distribution under the IBC, with accrued interest included. The supplier's attempt to withdraw the amount was rejected because its claim had to be pursued within the insolvency process. The writ petition challenging the MSME award was also held not maintainable, as an alternate statutory appeal remedy existed under the MSME Act and, independently, section 14 of the IBC barred continuation of proceedings against the corporate debtor after CIRP began.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
