Condonation of Delay denied: communication lapses and corporate restructuring found insufficient; prolonged inaction and lack of bona fides led to ref...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5961 to 5980 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 32A(2) of the IBC bars attachment or other action against a corporate debtor's property for offences committed before commencement of insolvency, and the statutory explanation expressly includes attachment within the prohibited action. Where the corporate debtor had already entered liquidation before the provisional attachment order was issued, the later attachment could not be sustained. The tribunal therefore treated both the provisional attachment order and its confirmation as contrary to Section 32A(2) and set them aside, holding that the property of the liquidating corporate debtor was immune from such post-liquidation attachment.
Section 32A(2) of the IBC bars attachment or other action against a corporate debtor's property for offences committed before commencement of insolvency, and the statutory explanation expressly includes attachment within the prohibited action. Where the corporate debtor had already entered liquidation before the provisional attachment order was issued, the later attachment could not be sustained. The tribunal therefore treated both the provisional attachment order and its confirmation as contrary to Section 32A(2) and set them aside, holding that the property of the liquidating corporate debtor was immune from such post-liquidation attachment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
