Country of Origin Certificates and declared transaction value supported preferential customs exemption where authenticity and invoice prices remained ...
Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the plea of denial of opportunity in assessment was factually untenable because statutory notices were issued, replies were filed, and the assessee had not raised the grievance before the first appellate authority. It further held that the dispute concerned only the year of taxability of contractual receipts, which depended on the accounting method actually followed. As the assessee failed to substantiate the claimed completed service contract method, had received the amounts in the relevant year, and the receipts were reflected in Form 26AS with tax deduction, the additions were sustained and the receipts were taxable in Assessment Year 2018-19.
ITAT held that the plea of denial of opportunity in assessment was factually untenable because statutory notices were issued, replies were filed, and the assessee had not raised the grievance before the first appellate authority. It further held that the dispute concerned only the year of taxability of contractual receipts, which depended on the accounting method actually followed. As the assessee failed to substantiate the claimed completed service contract method, had received the amounts in the relevant year, and the receipts were reflected in Form 26AS with tax deduction, the additions were sustained and the receipts were taxable in Assessment Year 2018-19.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.