Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Penalty under section 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notices under section 142(1) was held not exigible where the assessee sought adjournments, stated that the information was under compilation, and later furnished the required details. The Tribunal noted that the scrutiny assessment was completed under section 143(3) on the returned income itself, so the matter did not involve persistent default or a best judgment assessment under section 144. On these facts, the penalty was quashed.
Penalty under section 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notices under section 142(1) was held not exigible where the assessee sought adjournments, stated that the information was under compilation, and later furnished the required details. The Tribunal noted that the scrutiny assessment was completed under section 143(3) on the returned income itself, so the matter did not involve persistent default or a best judgment assessment under section 144. On these facts, the penalty was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
