Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Penalty under section 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notices under section 142(1) was held not exigible where the assessee sought adjournments, stated that the information was under compilation, and later furnished the required details. The Tribunal noted that the scrutiny assessment was completed under section 143(3) on the returned income itself, so the matter did not involve persistent default or a best judgment assessment under section 144. On these facts, the penalty was quashed.
Penalty under section 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with notices under section 142(1) was held not exigible where the assessee sought adjournments, stated that the information was under compilation, and later furnished the required details. The Tribunal noted that the scrutiny assessment was completed under section 143(3) on the returned income itself, so the matter did not involve persistent default or a best judgment assessment under section 144. On these facts, the penalty was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
