Validity of faceless assessment procedure challenged for jurisdictional AO intervention mid-remand, resulting in quashing of assessment for procedural...
Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
In a transfer pricing dispute concerning the software development services segment, the ITAT held that the Transfer Pricing Officer had not dealt with the five comparables remitted for reconsideration, and that the later DRP consideration did not cure the failure to follow the earlier appellate direction in time. The defect was treated as an irregularity requiring correction, not as a basis to annul the assessment. The Assessing Officer was therefore directed to exclude Acropetal Technologies, E-Zest Solutions, E-Infochips, ICRA Techno Analytics and Persistent Systems and recompute the arm's length price adjustment; the assessment was otherwise left undisturbed.
In a transfer pricing dispute concerning the software development services segment, the ITAT held that the Transfer Pricing Officer had not dealt with the five comparables remitted for reconsideration, and that the later DRP consideration did not cure the failure to follow the earlier appellate direction in time. The defect was treated as an irregularity requiring correction, not as a basis to annul the assessment. The Assessing Officer was therefore directed to exclude Acropetal Technologies, E-Zest Solutions, E-Infochips, ICRA Techno Analytics and Persistent Systems and recompute the arm's length price adjustment; the assessment was otherwise left undisturbed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
