Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1541 to 1560 of 96406 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For determining the arm's length price of inter-unit electricity transfers from a captive power plant, the Tribunal treated the industrial consumer tariff charged by the State Electricity Board as a valid comparable uncontrolled price and the proper measure of market value under the transfer pricing framework. It rejected the Revenue's contention that the distributor tariff was distorted by distribution functions, assets and risks, and declined to use the generator's sale rate as the benchmark. Following Supreme Court and High Court authorities, it upheld deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment on the captive power transfer and applied the same view to the remaining years on identical facts.
For determining the arm's length price of inter-unit electricity transfers from a captive power plant, the Tribunal treated the industrial consumer tariff charged by the State Electricity Board as a valid comparable uncontrolled price and the proper measure of market value under the transfer pricing framework. It rejected the Revenue's contention that the distributor tariff was distorted by distribution functions, assets and risks, and declined to use the generator's sale rate as the benchmark. Following Supreme Court and High Court authorities, it upheld deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment on the captive power transfer and applied the same view to the remaining years on identical facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
