Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
For determining the arm's length price of inter-unit electricity transfers from a captive power plant, the Tribunal treated the industrial consumer tariff charged by the State Electricity Board as a valid comparable uncontrolled price and the proper measure of market value under the transfer pricing framework. It rejected the Revenue's contention that the distributor tariff was distorted by distribution functions, assets and risks, and declined to use the generator's sale rate as the benchmark. Following Supreme Court and High Court authorities, it upheld deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment on the captive power transfer and applied the same view to the remaining years on identical facts.
For determining the arm's length price of inter-unit electricity transfers from a captive power plant, the Tribunal treated the industrial consumer tariff charged by the State Electricity Board as a valid comparable uncontrolled price and the proper measure of market value under the transfer pricing framework. It rejected the Revenue's contention that the distributor tariff was distorted by distribution functions, assets and risks, and declined to use the generator's sale rate as the benchmark. Following Supreme Court and High Court authorities, it upheld deletion of the transfer pricing adjustment on the captive power transfer and applied the same view to the remaining years on identical facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
