Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    GST appeal limitation cannot be bypassed through writ jurisdiction; conditional liberty granted to file appeal on deposit.
    Wrong statutory basis for waiver rejection led to quashing and remand for fresh consideration after hearing the taxpayer.
    Anti-profiteering in real estate: project-wise ITC benefit had to be passed on to homebuyers, with GST and interest added.
    Notice to a deceased person is void, and reassessment proceedings cannot be cured by legal representative provisions.
    Change of opinion bars reassessment where CSR-related deduction was already examined in the original assessment.
    Sufficient cause for delay in revision proceedings not shown; writ interference refused and merits observations directed to be ignored.
    Section 68 burden and shell-company allegation fail as ITAT deletes additions and allows business loss carry forward.
    Retrenchment compensation under BSNL's forced retirement scheme was held exempt as capital receipt under section 10(10B).
    Cheque tendered on due date counts as timely TDS payment when honoured without dishonour; interest under section 201(1A) deleted.
    Remand for verification of loan use, short-term capital gains tax rate, and section 80E deduction claim.
    Interest on short-term surplus deposits qualified for deduction as business income under section 80P(2)(a)(i).
    Mechanical approval under section 151 invalidates reopening of assessment and quashes reassessment proceedings
    Educational institution exemption upheld for Government-financed assessee, with prior ruling followed and assessment additions falling away.
    Bogus purchase disallowance limited to five percent where confirmations were partly absent and books were not rejected.
    Rectification under section 254(2) cannot be used to review merits; only obvious record errors can be corrected.
    Search assessment disputes: section 68 credits, bogus purchases, stock reconciliation and seized-noting verification shaped the tribunal's findings.
    Transfer pricing, section 41(1), and capital receipt treatment of incentives shaped the tribunal's mixed tax ruling.
    Delay condonation and misreporting under section 270A: ITAT rejected the belated quantum appeal but deleted penalty for disclosed facts.
    Reasoned policy relaxation orders required; unreasoned rejection of export relief request was set aside and remanded.
    Declared value of used machinery cannot be enhanced solely on a local engineer's certificate when Load Port evidence is substantially complete.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      The ITAT deleted penalty for alleged unexplained cash receipts,...

      Plausible explanation for offering income and paying tax led ITAT to delete penalty for alleged cash receipts.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Income TaxApril 8, 2026Case LawsAT
      The ITAT deleted penalty for alleged unexplained cash receipts, holding that the assessee's explanation that estimated income was offered and tax was paid to buy peace and avoid prolonged litigation was plausible on the facts. The Tribunal also noted that, on a similar explanation, the AO had already dropped penalty proceedings for under-reporting of income. On an overall review of the digital material and surrounding record, it found the evidence insufficient to justify sustaining the penalty for alleged cash transactions.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax