Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1541 to 1560 of 96406 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Washing, removal of waste and sizing of imported manganese ore were treated as processes that converted run-of-mine ore into manganese concentrates. The Tribunal, following its earlier ruling, held that where such processing changes ore into concentrate under the chapter note and HSN explanation, the concentrate becomes distinct from ore in law. An exemption confined to manganese ores could not be extended to concentrates, so the claimed CVD exemption was not available. The imported goods were therefore correctly classified as manganese concentrates, and denial of the notification benefit was upheld.
Washing, removal of waste and sizing of imported manganese ore were treated as processes that converted run-of-mine ore into manganese concentrates. The Tribunal, following its earlier ruling, held that where such processing changes ore into concentrate under the chapter note and HSN explanation, the concentrate becomes distinct from ore in law. An exemption confined to manganese ores could not be extended to concentrates, so the claimed CVD exemption was not available. The imported goods were therefore correctly classified as manganese concentrates, and denial of the notification benefit was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.