Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
Section 7 of FEMA and the export regulations require exporters to realise and repatriate full export proceeds within the stipulated time, and extension is available only on sufficient cause shown. The Tribunal sustained contravention where export proceeds remained unrealised for years, no effective recovery steps were documented, and alleged foreign buyer distress was unsupported by official records or concrete recovery action. Regulation 16(1)(i) was read as imposing a primary duty to ship goods within one year of advance receipt; failure to do so, without satisfactory explanation or adjustment against other exports, justified contravention. Directors in charge of business were also liable unless they proved lack of knowledge or due diligence; one director was excluded on facts.
Section 7 of FEMA and the export regulations require exporters to realise and repatriate full export proceeds within the stipulated time, and extension is available only on sufficient cause shown. The Tribunal sustained contravention where export proceeds remained unrealised for years, no effective recovery steps were documented, and alleged foreign buyer distress was unsupported by official records or concrete recovery action. Regulation 16(1)(i) was read as imposing a primary duty to ship goods within one year of advance receipt; failure to do so, without satisfactory explanation or adjustment against other exports, justified contravention. Directors in charge of business were also liable unless they proved lack of knowledge or due diligence; one director was excluded on facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.