Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Section 7 of FEMA and the export regulations require exporters to realise and repatriate full export proceeds within the stipulated time, and extension is available only on sufficient cause shown. The Tribunal sustained contravention where export proceeds remained unrealised for years, no effective recovery steps were documented, and alleged foreign buyer distress was unsupported by official records or concrete recovery action. Regulation 16(1)(i) was read as imposing a primary duty to ship goods within one year of advance receipt; failure to do so, without satisfactory explanation or adjustment against other exports, justified contravention. Directors in charge of business were also liable unless they proved lack of knowledge or due diligence; one director was excluded on facts.
Section 7 of FEMA and the export regulations require exporters to realise and repatriate full export proceeds within the stipulated time, and extension is available only on sufficient cause shown. The Tribunal sustained contravention where export proceeds remained unrealised for years, no effective recovery steps were documented, and alleged foreign buyer distress was unsupported by official records or concrete recovery action. Regulation 16(1)(i) was read as imposing a primary duty to ship goods within one year of advance receipt; failure to do so, without satisfactory explanation or adjustment against other exports, justified contravention. Directors in charge of business were also liable unless they proved lack of knowledge or due diligence; one director was excluded on facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.