Limitation for final assessment under sections 144C and 153 treated jointly, resulting in quashing of timebarred assessment order and liberty to reviv...
Deductibility of settlement payments for securities law penalties and treatment of unexplained cash credits in share trading -- Tribunal upholds posit...
Threshold for allottee-initiated insolvency petitions in leasehold real estate upheld; petition admitted after possession letters deemed legally ineff...
Contravention of foreign exchange rules in crossborder diamond payments; appellate tribunal reduces one appellant's penalty for delay and proportional...
Section 7 of FEMA and the export regulations require exporters to realise and repatriate full export proceeds within the stipulated time, and extension is available only on sufficient cause shown. The Tribunal sustained contravention where export proceeds remained unrealised for years, no effective recovery steps were documented, and alleged foreign buyer distress was unsupported by official records or concrete recovery action. Regulation 16(1)(i) was read as imposing a primary duty to ship goods within one year of advance receipt; failure to do so, without satisfactory explanation or adjustment against other exports, justified contravention. Directors in charge of business were also liable unless they proved lack of knowledge or due diligence; one director was excluded on facts.
Section 7 of FEMA and the export regulations require exporters to realise and repatriate full export proceeds within the stipulated time, and extension is available only on sufficient cause shown. The Tribunal sustained contravention where export proceeds remained unrealised for years, no effective recovery steps were documented, and alleged foreign buyer distress was unsupported by official records or concrete recovery action. Regulation 16(1)(i) was read as imposing a primary duty to ship goods within one year of advance receipt; failure to do so, without satisfactory explanation or adjustment against other exports, justified contravention. Directors in charge of business were also liable unless they proved lack of knowledge or due diligence; one director was excluded on facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.