Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Section 7 of FEMA and the export regulations require exporters to realise and repatriate full export proceeds within the stipulated time, and extension is available only on sufficient cause shown. The Tribunal sustained contravention where export proceeds remained unrealised for years, no effective recovery steps were documented, and alleged foreign buyer distress was unsupported by official records or concrete recovery action. Regulation 16(1)(i) was read as imposing a primary duty to ship goods within one year of advance receipt; failure to do so, without satisfactory explanation or adjustment against other exports, justified contravention. Directors in charge of business were also liable unless they proved lack of knowledge or due diligence; one director was excluded on facts.
Section 7 of FEMA and the export regulations require exporters to realise and repatriate full export proceeds within the stipulated time, and extension is available only on sufficient cause shown. The Tribunal sustained contravention where export proceeds remained unrealised for years, no effective recovery steps were documented, and alleged foreign buyer distress was unsupported by official records or concrete recovery action. Regulation 16(1)(i) was read as imposing a primary duty to ship goods within one year of advance receipt; failure to do so, without satisfactory explanation or adjustment against other exports, justified contravention. Directors in charge of business were also liable unless they proved lack of knowledge or due diligence; one director was excluded on facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.