Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Procedural lapse cannot defeat concessional tax benefit where eligibility is undisputed and delay is short and bona fide.
    Section 170A limits post-amalgamation assessment to modification only where the assessment was already completed.
    Book profit treatment for bad debts and directory audit-report filing shaped the outcome on deduction claims.
    Bona fide treaty relief claim defeats penalty where income was disclosed and no concealment or inaccurate particulars were proved.
    Prior-period expenditure may be considered in the correct assessment year when genuineness is undisputed and revised computation is filed.
    Commercial expediency and rectification limits upheld as interest deduction was allowed and no apparent mistake was found.
    Reassessment and fee-for-technical-services classification: reopening upheld, but certain reimbursements and mobilization charges fell outside treaty ...
    Set-off of unabsorbed depreciation against unaccounted stock addition allowed; later restrictions under Sections 79A and 115BBE did not apply.
    Unexplained expenditure on purchases cannot rest on suspicion where books, stock records and bank evidence remain unrebutted.
    Charitable registration operates prospectively under the amended scheme, with retrospective benefit unavailable absent pending proceedings.
    Section 80P deduction for co-operative societies remains available despite nominal members and housing society status, with limited interest income tr...
    Overriding title, rectification, and bad debt claims: Tribunal rejects DICGC diversion but allows set-off dispute and write-off relief.
    Invalid reassessment approval and wrong post-search procedure led to quashing, with relief on unexplained investment and telescoping.
    Penalty under sections 271D and 271(1)(c) deleted where cheque receipts and bona fide loss claim defeated alleged concealment.
    Separate taxable entity principle upheld for a partnership firm; pre-existence interest expenditure remained disallowed.
    Provisional bank account attachment lapses on expiry unless extended in time, restoring the right to operate accounts.
    NFEP shortfall does not create duty on installed EOU capital goods; penalty also falls with the unsustainable demand.
    Retail sale price redetermination cannot support differential CVD recovery for post-import relabelling of mobile phones.
    Export valuation evidence failed where statements lacked corroboration and electronic records were inadmissible under customs law.
    Classification by test report upheld, while valuation and SEZ duty exemption were remanded for fresh adjudication.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters
      Central Excise

      Section 9D compliance is mandatory before statements recorded...

      Section 9D compliance and corroborative evidence requirements defeated clandestine excise demand and penalties.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Central ExciseApril 8, 2026Case LawsAT
      Section 9D compliance is mandatory before statements recorded under section 14 of the Central Excise Act can be relied on; where the maker is not first examined and the statement is not admitted in accordance with section 9D, denial of cross-examination does not cure the defect, and such statements cannot support the demand. Clandestine manufacture and removal must be proved by positive, clinching corroborative evidence; in the absence of documentary support, excess inputs, unrecorded production, stock discrepancy, or transport records, the allegation failed. Penalty under rule 26 also could not stand without a finding that the goods were liable to confiscation, so the duty demand and penalties were set aside.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax