Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An assessment under Section 73 of the Tamil Nadu GST Act was set aside because the assessing authority did not adequately consider the assessee's documentary evidence on mismatch, alleged hypothetical supplies and double taxation. The court noted that the dispute depended on verification and reconciliation of the supporting material already stated to have been filed, so the proper course was to allow the assessee to file an additional reply and documents item-wise before the original authority. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration and correct determination of liability after granting that opportunity.
An assessment under Section 73 of the Tamil Nadu GST Act was set aside because the assessing authority did not adequately consider the assessee's documentary evidence on mismatch, alleged hypothetical supplies and double taxation. The court noted that the dispute depended on verification and reconciliation of the supporting material already stated to have been filed, so the proper course was to allow the assessee to file an additional reply and documents item-wise before the original authority. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration and correct determination of liability after granting that opportunity.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
