Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Rebate received from a bank for payment of excise duty through a corporate card was treated by the AAR as a post-transaction monetary adjustment, not consideration for an identifiable supply of goods or services. Because taxable supply under the GST law requires consideration and a quid pro quo, and the rebate merely reduced the applicant's monetary liability, it fell within a transaction in money and outside the scope of supply. The Authority also noted the arrangement operated as short-term financial accommodation, with the rebate functioning as a discount linked to that facility. The rebate was therefore not liable to GST.
Rebate received from a bank for payment of excise duty through a corporate card was treated by the AAR as a post-transaction monetary adjustment, not consideration for an identifiable supply of goods or services. Because taxable supply under the GST law requires consideration and a quid pro quo, and the rebate merely reduced the applicant's monetary liability, it fell within a transaction in money and outside the scope of supply. The Authority also noted the arrangement operated as short-term financial accommodation, with the rebate functioning as a discount linked to that facility. The rebate was therefore not liable to GST.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
