Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
Belated filing of Form 10CCB did not, by itself, justify denial of deduction under section 80IA where the return was filed in time and the audit report was on record before processing under section 143(1). The Tribunal held that filing Form 10CCB by the due date is a procedural requirement, and once the report was furnished before issuance of the intimation, the CPC was bound to examine it. On that basis, the Commissioner (Appeals)' order allowing the deduction was upheld and the Revenue's challenge to the disallowance failed.
Belated filing of Form 10CCB did not, by itself, justify denial of deduction under section 80IA where the return was filed in time and the audit report was on record before processing under section 143(1). The Tribunal held that filing Form 10CCB by the due date is a procedural requirement, and once the report was furnished before issuance of the intimation, the CPC was bound to examine it. On that basis, the Commissioner (Appeals)' order allowing the deduction was upheld and the Revenue's challenge to the disallowance failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.