Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
Belated filing of Form 10CCB did not, by itself, justify denial of deduction under section 80IA where the return was filed in time and the audit report was on record before processing under section 143(1). The Tribunal held that filing Form 10CCB by the due date is a procedural requirement, and once the report was furnished before issuance of the intimation, the CPC was bound to examine it. On that basis, the Commissioner (Appeals)' order allowing the deduction was upheld and the Revenue's challenge to the disallowance failed.
Belated filing of Form 10CCB did not, by itself, justify denial of deduction under section 80IA where the return was filed in time and the audit report was on record before processing under section 143(1). The Tribunal held that filing Form 10CCB by the due date is a procedural requirement, and once the report was furnished before issuance of the intimation, the CPC was bound to examine it. On that basis, the Commissioner (Appeals)' order allowing the deduction was upheld and the Revenue's challenge to the disallowance failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
