Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Corpus donations were held exempt under section 11(1)(d) because the decisive factor is the donor's specific direction, not whether the trust deed separately authorises acceptance of such contributions. The donor letters described the receipts as corpus donations, and the Revenue did not dispute their genuineness or show diversion from the trust's objects. The Tribunal also applied consistency, noting that similar receipts had been accepted in later years on the same facts. As corpus receipts were excluded from income, the alleged shortfall in application of income could not survive; in any event, Form No. 9A had been filed before completion of assessment, supporting accumulation relief.
Corpus donations were held exempt under section 11(1)(d) because the decisive factor is the donor's specific direction, not whether the trust deed separately authorises acceptance of such contributions. The donor letters described the receipts as corpus donations, and the Revenue did not dispute their genuineness or show diversion from the trust's objects. The Tribunal also applied consistency, noting that similar receipts had been accepted in later years on the same facts. As corpus receipts were excluded from income, the alleged shortfall in application of income could not survive; in any event, Form No. 9A had been filed before completion of assessment, supporting accumulation relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.