Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96176 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Corpus donations were held exempt under section 11(1)(d) because the decisive factor is the donor's specific direction, not whether the trust deed separately authorises acceptance of such contributions. The donor letters described the receipts as corpus donations, and the Revenue did not dispute their genuineness or show diversion from the trust's objects. The Tribunal also applied consistency, noting that similar receipts had been accepted in later years on the same facts. As corpus receipts were excluded from income, the alleged shortfall in application of income could not survive; in any event, Form No. 9A had been filed before completion of assessment, supporting accumulation relief.
Corpus donations were held exempt under section 11(1)(d) because the decisive factor is the donor's specific direction, not whether the trust deed separately authorises acceptance of such contributions. The donor letters described the receipts as corpus donations, and the Revenue did not dispute their genuineness or show diversion from the trust's objects. The Tribunal also applied consistency, noting that similar receipts had been accepted in later years on the same facts. As corpus receipts were excluded from income, the alleged shortfall in application of income could not survive; in any event, Form No. 9A had been filed before completion of assessment, supporting accumulation relief.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
