Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CBDT Instruction No. 01/2011 placed jurisdiction over a corporate assessee in Kolkata with income above the prescribed limit in the AC/DC, so a reassessment notice issued by the Income Tax Officer lacked authority and the reopening was void ab initio. Separately, the Tribunal held that the NFAC had no jurisdiction to pass the reassessment order before the section 151A notification bringing the scheme into force, making that order equally void ab initio. The reassessment proceedings were therefore unsustainable on jurisdictional grounds and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
CBDT Instruction No. 01/2011 placed jurisdiction over a corporate assessee in Kolkata with income above the prescribed limit in the AC/DC, so a reassessment notice issued by the Income Tax Officer lacked authority and the reopening was void ab initio. Separately, the Tribunal held that the NFAC had no jurisdiction to pass the reassessment order before the section 151A notification bringing the scheme into force, making that order equally void ab initio. The reassessment proceedings were therefore unsustainable on jurisdictional grounds and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.