Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5661 to 5680 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CBDT Instruction No. 01/2011 placed jurisdiction over a corporate assessee in Kolkata with income above the prescribed limit in the AC/DC, so a reassessment notice issued by the Income Tax Officer lacked authority and the reopening was void ab initio. Separately, the Tribunal held that the NFAC had no jurisdiction to pass the reassessment order before the section 151A notification bringing the scheme into force, making that order equally void ab initio. The reassessment proceedings were therefore unsustainable on jurisdictional grounds and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
CBDT Instruction No. 01/2011 placed jurisdiction over a corporate assessee in Kolkata with income above the prescribed limit in the AC/DC, so a reassessment notice issued by the Income Tax Officer lacked authority and the reopening was void ab initio. Separately, the Tribunal held that the NFAC had no jurisdiction to pass the reassessment order before the section 151A notification bringing the scheme into force, making that order equally void ab initio. The reassessment proceedings were therefore unsustainable on jurisdictional grounds and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
